Routing on EX switch broken after changing from VC to non VC - solved
I'm posting this mostly in case someone else comes across it. We had an EX4500 which was configured to be a virtual chassis but the 2nd member (of 2 total) was removed by an unscrupulous person. It was...
View ArticleRe: Routing between two virtual-routers
Hi Dave, Did you ever find a solution/reason for this?
View ArticleClik here to view.
Generated route - Policy applied but route not being installed?
Hi all, I am trying to install a generated route using a policy referencing a direct link to an eBGP neigbor using vSRX. R9 <<< ----- >>> R8 The basic configuration is: Default...
View ArticleRe: Generated route - Policy applied but route not being installed?
try to change from protocol local to protocol direct or change "route-filter 84.10.113.0/30 exact" to "route-filter 84.10.113.1/32 exact" compare your output of "show route " and configuration of policy
View ArticleRe: Generated route - Policy applied but route not being installed?
Hi Akushner, Thanks for the reply. I have tried both of those and still no luck. Martin
View ArticleRe: Generated route - Policy applied but route not being installed?
Hi, Direct routes for multiaccess networks cannot contribute to a generated route because a forwarding next hop cannot be derived from the mere presence of the local interface, as is possible in the...
View ArticleRe: Generated route - Policy applied but route not being installed?
Hi Doods thanks for the information.
View ArticleRe: Generated route - Policy applied but route not being installed?
Reference: Junos Enterprise Routing: A Practical Guide to Junos Routing and Certification, page 126
View ArticleRe: Generated route - Policy applied but route not being installed?
Hi Doods, thanks for the pointer on the book and page reference. However on page 271 am I misreading that its a direct route conributing to the generated route on this: [edit]lab@Yeast# show...
View ArticleRe: Generated route - Policy applied but route not being installed?
Hi, Yes beceause it is a point to point interface. (/31).
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: RR and BGP group
if i remember correctly, i did the add-path command on both the send/receive in the lab previously.I can get another active route towards the destination, this is without the advertise-inactive. hope...
View ArticleCOS confusion
Dear FriendsI have a doubt on cos.This is on the forwarding-class section, and based on what i understand will be below traffic coming in towards the router and put into either MF or BA classified....
View ArticleRe: Generated route - Policy applied but route not being installed?
I still seem unable to get the Generated route to recognise the contributing route and install 0/0 into the route table? set interfaces ge-0/0/1 description "toR9-BGP Link to AS34"set interfaces...
View ArticleRe: Generated route - Policy applied but route not being installed?
Hello,If Your goal is to send everything into ge-0/0/1 when it is up/up, then You won't be able to do it with generate route. Static 0/0 with next-hop 84.10.109.1 is the solution.If Your goal is to...
View ArticleRe: COS confusion
Hi, If I understand your question correctly, you want to know why a user download is assigned queue7 and not classified under other high priority queues. So if this is the case, here is my opinion. COS...
View Articletroubleshoot PFE Invalide interface
Dear all, How can I troubleshoot a PFE Discard "Invalid interface" ? show pfe statistics traffic Packet Forwarding Engine traffic statistics: Input packets: 1758 1 pps Output packets: 1490 0 pps Packet...
View ArticleRe: troubleshoot PFE Invalide interface
Had these previously on another platform and they were an indication that the incoming interface did not recognize the source mac or ip as valid in the forwarding table for that interface. Sort of...
View ArticleRe: troubleshoot PFE Invalide interface
hello, Thanks for your reply. This what I'm understanding for the description but I'm looking for troublshooting... which mac ? which ip .... --Salah
View ArticleEVPN route reject due to the lack of a valid target community
Dear forum ! I have a strange behavior regarding the EVPN route exchange between two PE (PE1 and PE2) in DC1. I have a iBGP sessions between two PE that share the same CE connectivity. Those two PE...
View Article