Re: LDP tunneling over RSVP not work
Hi. So is there any way to make LDP Tunneling over RSVP at non ABR ? I have a problem like that, too. R3----<LDP- Area 5>-------R1----------<Area 5>-----------<R2>---------<Area...
View ArticleRe: LDP tunneling over RSVP not work
Hello,Have You inclided lo0.0 on every router into [protocols ldp]? This is needed for LDP tunneling to work.If yes and still no luck, please configure an OSPF Virtual Link between R1 and R2, this...
View ArticleRe: LDP tunneling over RSVP not work
So you mean, the RSVP TE LSP has to configure on ABR in case running LDP over RSVP TE ?
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: LDP tunneling over RSVP not work
Hello,hoand wrote:So you mean, the RSVP TE LSP has to configure on ABR in case running LDP over RSVP TE ?I thought You did that?If You haven't already configured RSVP on Your ABR R2 then You won't get...
View ArticleGet your copy of the new O'Reilly book "MPLS in the SDN Era"!
The new MPLS in the SDN Era book is already shipping! We just received the first copies last week. This book's focus is interoperability. Its 900+ pages cover a wide range of MPLS technologies,...
View ArticleRe: Route based IPsec on MX
HI, Yes I have seen that document and it appears to be a policy based configuration. I am looking to use an IPsec tunnel to connect an SRX210 to an MX104. I want to use a route based VPN that allows...
View ArticleRe: Route based IPsec on MX
Hello, Regalis wrote:HI, Yes I have seen that document and it appears to be a policy based configuration.It is not. It is route-based IPSec and SRX-style policy-based IPSec is not supported on MX.It is...
View ArticleRe: Route based IPsec on MX
Oh, OK, so is it possible to put an address on the ms-x/y/z.a interface under family inet?
View ArticleRe: JNCIE-SP bootcamp
Hi Faizan, There is usually plenty of notice when a lab will change ie blueprint update etc. wether the lab topology changes, who knows, as you should be unaware of the topology beforehand as all...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Segment Routing ( SPRING ) support
There is a beta version of code. If you contact you friendly SE they should be able to get you a copy
View ArticleLooking to hire!
I am the CTO for Independent Technology Group (ITG) a Los Angeles, California based Juniper Networks Elite reseller partner. We are expanding and looking to hire a mid to senior level engineer with...
View ArticleHub Spoke VPN with PE-CE OSPF
Hi bros. I have VPN Hub Spoke topology. CE-PE routing protocols I used OSPF. At Hub PE, I had two vrf (CE-SPOKE and HUB-VPN). At CE-SPOKE vrf, I received all routes from Spoke CE...
View ArticleRe: Hub Spoke VPN with PE-CE OSPF
Could you please provide the current configuration (and preferably the network topology) in order to better understand what you are doing? Thanks,Carsten
View ArticleRoute based VPN between MX and SRX
I am trying to establish an IPsec tunnel between an SRX210 and MX80 but without success. The MX shows the following logs: lab@CORE_RTR_B> show log ike.log Jan 26 14:41:55 CORE_RTR_B...
View ArticleRe: Route based VPN between MX and SRX
Hello,Do You actually have MS-MIC in Your MX80 rear slot?If yes then it cannot have its interfaces designated as "ms-0/0/0", 0/0/0 is for 10GE front ports.It should be ms-0/2/0.HTHThxAlex
View ArticleRe: Route based VPN between MX and SRX
Yes I do. Well spotted. I have changed that and now it works! Thanks
View ArticleRe: Hub Spoke VPN with PE-CE OSPF
Yeah, here is my topology CE(SPK1)----------PE(SP1)------------------ PE-HUB(vrf-hub)------------------CE(HUB) PE-HUB(vrf-spk)...
View ArticleRe: Hub Spoke VPN with PE-CE OSPF
Ok, first of all, if you receive a route from another PE router via MP-BGP and export it via OSPF to your CE router it will be of type-5 by default. That's standard OSPF behaviour as the route is...
View Article