Quantcast
Channel: All Routing posts
Viewing all 8688 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Do we have show ipv6 bgp summary command?


Re: Do we have show ipv6 bgp summary command?

$
0
0

If you are not running JunosE software then you can see the the ipv6 bgp summary under below command itself;

>show bgp summary

Re: Do we have show ipv6 bgp summary command?

$
0
0

show bgp ipv6 summary cannot work on my device. so we do not have a specific command for ipv6 in this situation. only way to do is show bgp summary. Thank you

Re: Do we have show ipv6 bgp summary command?

$
0
0

Hi, 

 

Looks like "show bgp ipv6 summary" is available on ERX devices only [JunosE]. I don't see it on an MX.

 

Also, it is possible to exchange inet6 routes over v4 peers, so I guess its the table inet6.0 under the BGP peer that is more important? It seems to be along the same logic that there is no "show ip route" or "show ipv6 route" in Junos but rather "show route table inet.0" and "show route table inet6.0".

 

Interesting to see if such a command is introduced in the future. I feel this may be needed especially when you want to list ipv6 neighbors only.

 

Cheers,

Ashvin

Re: Do we have show ipv6 bgp summary command?

enabled/up in Juniper is Up/Up in Cisco ?

$
0
0

Hi when show interface a/b/c in Juniper. I can see the interface is enabled Up. enabled/up in Juniper is Up/Up in Cisco ? 

Thank you

Re: enabled/up in Juniper is Up/Up in Cisco ?

$
0
0

Yes, enabled up is the same as up, up

Re: enabled/up in Juniper is Up/Up in Cisco ?


Re: Sending default route to IBGP neighbors

$
0
0

Ok. I'm getting the routes, now I have to solve for issues with the SIP phones accross the network and then remove the VPN's from the lproduction sites. I have found that I am not able to remove the route to the default gateway as this makes other routes in the MPLS show up as inactive.

Re: Sending default route to IBGP neighbors

$
0
0

For the SIP issues, I assume you have the SRX in flow mode and all the default ALG settings.  You can review the SIP call verification options and configuration examples here.

 

http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos15.1x49/topics/task/verification/alg-security-sip-configuration-verifying.html

 

http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos12.1x47/topics/task/configuration/alg-security-sip-configuring.html

 

I'm afraid I don't understand the remaining routing issue.  Could you elaborate on what is missing in the remote site route table or what the traffic probem is?

Re: How much firewall filter (ACLs) MX80 & MX240 can handle

$
0
0

Hello,

 


trunglc wrote:

 

 

However, I cannot find similar command in MX5/10/40/80. Any help?

 

Thank you so much,

 

Trung

 


The "show jnh 0 pool usage" command is also valid for MX5/10/40/80.

And I am unable to find where in the "Juniper MX Series" it says this command does not work on MX5/10/40/80. 

If Your question is that You cannot select "fpc5" to execute this command on, the MX5/10/40/80 has only 1 PFE and it is referred to as "tfeb0":

 

aarseniev@mx80labrouter> request pfe execute target tfeb0 command "show jnh 0 pool usage"   
Jun 25 17:29:34
SENT: Ukern command: show jnh 0 pool usage
GOT:
GOT: EDMEM overall usage:
GOT: [NH///////|FW////////|CNTR///////////|HASH////////////|ENCAPS////|------------------]
GOT: 0         4.0        8.0             14.0             20.7       24.8               32.0M
GOT:
GOT: Next Hop
GOT: [*******************************|---------------] 4.0M (66% | 34%)
GOT:
GOT: Firewall
GOT: [|----------------------|RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR] 4.0M (<1% | >99%)
GOT:
GOT: Counters
GOT: [*************************|---------------------------------------------] 6.0M (35% | 65%)
GOT:
GOT: HASH
GOT: [********************************************************************************] 6.7M (100% | 0%)
GOT:
GOT: ENCAPS
GOT: [************************************************] 4.1M (100% | 0%)
GOT:
GOT: Shared Memory - NH/FW/CNTR/HASH/ENCAPS
GOT: [--------------------------------------------------------------------------------] 7.2M (0% | 100%)
GOT:
LOCAL: End of file

HTH

Thx

Alex

 

Default route question

$
0
0

map.png

AS200 has static route for 192.168.1.0/30 to AS300

AS100 getting route from AS200 via BGP

 

Traffic first come to AS100 than goes to AS200 because of route than goes AS300 because AS200 has static route record.

 

AS300 default route goes to AS100

 

How do I change return traffic for 192.168.1.0/30 to AS200? Now, AS300 forward all return traffic to AS100(172.16.0.9) bıt I need to change default route path to AS200 for 192.168.1.0/30

 

 

Re: Default route question

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I didn't get a good picture of the issue.

What are the source and destination of the traffic and where are those endpoints attached to the network/AS.

 

Cheers,

Ashvin

Re: Default route question

$
0
0

I'm also not sure what you are trying to accomplish.  But I think you are trying to insure that traffic you get from AS200 with the 192.168.1.0/30 destination have their reply packets returned to AS200 instead of using the default route up to AS100.

 

If that is the case you would need to us FBF (filter based forwarding) to route based on the source address of the reply traffic 192.168.1.0/30 and forward to AS200 as the next hop.

 

http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos15.1/topics/example/firewall-filter-option-filter-based-forwarding-example.html

Re: Default route question

$
0
0

Yes, it is correct, but i'm searhing any way to do this without commit on AS300

 

Now I do this with filter based forwarding. Every time I need to add sourceip address to fiter, but I'm searching do this with BGP community.


Re: Default route question

$
0
0

Hi, 

 

If I understand correctly, routes towards AS100 from AS300 are going through the direct link due to shortest AS-PATH.

 

To prefer the routes towards AS200, you can tag the routes at the source [AS100] with BGP communities and then at AS300 make those routes preferred towards AS200 by AS-Prepending direct from AS100 to increase the AS-PATH.

 

Example of BGP import policy on AS300:

policy-statement EXPAND {
    term AS-EXPAND {
        from {
            as-path AS100;
            community TEST;
        }
        then {
            as-path-expand last-as count 2;
accept; } } } as-path AS100 "100 .*";

Cheers,

Ashvin

 

 

Re: Default route question

$
0
0

 

 

Example:

AS100 has static route for 192.168.1.0/24 to 172.16.0.10

AS200 has static route for 192.168.1.0/30 to 172.16.0.6

AS300 has interface 192.168.1.1/30

A client(192.168.1.2) connect to AS300 via interface

 

1- Source 10.0.0.2 destination 192.168.1.2

  Traffic first come to AS100, than goes to AS200

  AS200 has static route so traffic send to AS300

  AS300 send traffic to client.

 

2- When client reply a packet

    Traffic come to gateway 192.168.1.1 (AS300)

    AS300 send reply to AS100 because of default route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 172.16.0.9

 

I need to send reply traffic to AS200? How can I do it?

 

 

 

 

 

Re: Default route question

How can show the comment after using command commit comment xxxx ?

$
0
0

Hi I type the command : commit comment xxxx in MX960. What command can show me the comment and how to use the command: commit commend xxxx? Thank you

Re: How can show the comment after using command commit comment xxxx ?

$
0
0

Hi,

 

"show system commit" would list the commits and the associated comments.

 

Cheers,

Ashvin

Viewing all 8688 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>