Quantcast
Channel: All Routing posts
Viewing all 8688 articles
Browse latest View live

What's the difference between MX204, MX204-IR and MX204-R

$
0
0

Hi Folks,

 

can you tell me what's the difference betwenn these 3 models of the MX204?

MX204JNP204/MX204 Fixed 1 RU System includes 3 Fan Trays and 2 Power Supplies
MX204-IRJNP204/MX204 Fixed 1 RU System -IR MODE includes 3 Fan Trays and 2 Power Supplies
MX204-RJNP204/MX204 Fixed 1 RU System -R MODE includes 3 Fan Trays and 2 Power Supplies

 

Can I assume that the differences for the MPCs described here also apply to the MX204/MX204-IR/MX204-R?

 

Screenshot_2019-05-15 Licenses for PTX, MX, M and T Series - TechLibrary - Juniper Networks.png

 

 

 

 

 

Also very interesting to know is if you can upgrade the base MX204 to an MX204-IR or MX204-R through a license?

Thank you for your answers!
Falco

 


Re: What's the difference between MX204, MX204-IR and MX204-R

$
0
0

Hi Falco,

 

you are absolutely correct. The licensing matches the MPC scaling you are refering to.

On MX204 and MX10003 also HQoS and Jflow is included the SKU where on MX240/480/960 you need extra licenses on top.

 

You can buy the MX204 base SKU and upgrade it later to either -IR or -R via the 'S-MX104-IR' and 'S-MX104-R' licenses. Just remember to reach -R scaling, you need to purchase both licenses (but the tocal cost is the same as buying MX204-R from the start).

 

If you buy an upgrade to -IR or -R you also need seperate support SKUs on the licenses - but again the total cost is the same as buying the combined support.

 

Bonus information: The MX204 is about to be included in the Juniper Flex Program where you buy the "base/IR/R" scale via a subscription on top MX204 base hardware. I cannot find any official pages specific to MX204 but the general page for the flex program is here: https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/licensing/topics/topic-map/juniper-flex-program.html

 

There will only be an advanced and premium SKU for MX204. Reach out to your local account manager to get more information. For now the existing -IR and -R SKUs will still be orderable for some time :-)

 

I hope this was the information you were looking for.

 

 

Re: What's the difference between MX204, MX204-IR and MX204-R

$
0
0

Hi Jonas,


that helped me a lot.


Thank you for the answer and your time!


Cheers,

Falco

Problem routing from inet.0 to routing instance

$
0
0

Hi There, 

 

I currently have an issue where I am unable to route from inet.0 to a directly connected device that is in a routing instance

 

The device is reachable when sourcing from the routing-instance however I need to be able to access the device from inet.0.

 

The peer device address is 185.96.18.29 and is connected to ge-0/0/6.782 and BGP is established

 

What am I missing that is making it so that I can not reach the device from inet.0?

 

Interface

description "TEST";
vlan-id 782;
family inet {
    address 185.96.18.28/31;
}

Routing Instance

 

test {
instance-type virtual-router; interface ge-0/0/1.301; interface ge-0/0/1.302; interface ge-0/0/6.782; routing-options { interface-routes { rib-group inet rib-test-interface-routes-v4; } autonomous-system 65500; } protocols { bgp { traceoptions { file btswip_bgp.log size 20k; flag all; } group supplier { neighbor 147.152.22.133 { peer-as 65235; } neighbor 147.152.22.129 { peer-as 65233; } } group customers { neighbor 185.96.18.29 { peer-as 64565; } } } }

Rib Group

    rib-test-interface-routes-v4 {
        import-rib [ BT_WSIP.inet.0 inet.0 ];
    }
}

Interface Route - is done via an apply-group

int-routes-test-v4 {
    routing-options {
        interface-routes {
            rib-group inet rib-test-interface-routes-v4;
        }
    }
}

interface-routes {
apply-groups [ int-route-legacy-voip int-routes-test-v4 ];
}

Route output

inet.0: 172 destinations, 228 routes (170 active, 0 holddown, 2 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both

185.96.18.28/31    *[Direct/0] 01:59:07
                    > via ge-0/0/6.782

test.inet.0: 9 destinations, 15 routes (9 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both

185.96.18.28/31    *[Direct/0] 1w6d 21:59:36
                    > via ge-0/0/6.782

Re: Problem routing from inet.0 to routing instance

$
0
0
Routing instance may not have return route for inet.0 routes. When you ping from inet.0 what is the source ip you are using?

Re: Problem routing from inet.0 to routing instance

$
0
0

Ah that true, only the BGP routes are leaking into the virtual router.

 

Do you know how to have direct routes leaked into a VRF?

 

Re: Problem routing from inet.0 to routing instance

Re: Problem routing from inet.0 to routing instance


Re: Problem routing from inet.0 to routing instance

$
0
0

I think your problem is the return traffic.  Are you doing ping 182.96.18.29 wihout specifying the source address? 

 

ping from inet.0.png

Regards,

Re: Anyone success simulate MC-LAG in logical-system?

$
0
0

Hi Rahul,

 

 

The url that u shared still show two physical MX/vMX. I'm just have one MX only and want to simulate the MC-LAG. Is it possible?

 

BGP stuck in Connect state

$
0
0

Hi 

I peer EBGP woth cisco router. Status of BGP stuck in Connect state 

Output of log is below

 

May 17 10:56:30.470657 task_timer_reset: reset BGP_4652.61.19.60.1_Connect
May 17 10:56:30.470666 task_timer_set_oneshot_latest: timer BGP_4652.61.19.60.1_Connect interval set to 1:04
May 17 10:56:34.464676 task_process_events_internal: connect ready for BGP_4652.61.19.61.1
May 17 10:56:34.464714 bgp_connect_complete: error connecting to 61.19.61.1 (External AS 4652): Unknown error: -880758492
May 17 10:56:34.464718 BGP peer 61.19.61.1 (External AS 4652) CLOSE: close socket 88
May 17 10:56:34.464720 task_close: close socket 88 task BGP_4652.61.19.61.1
May 17 10:56:34.464723 task_reset_socket: task BGP_4652.61.19.61.1 socket 88
May 17 10:56:34.464750 bgp_event: peer 61.19.61.1 (External AS 4652) old state Connect event OpenFail new state Idle
May 17 10:56:34.464900 bgp_event: peer 61.19.61.1 (External AS 4652) old state Idle event Start new state Connect
May 17 10:56:34.464906 bgp_connect_start: peer 61.19.61.1 (External AS 4652)
May 17 10:56:34.464909 bgp_event: peer 61.19.61.1 (External AS 4652) old state Connect event ConnectRetry new state Connect
May 17 10:56:34.464937 task_get_socket: domain AF_INET type SOCK_STREAM protocol 0 socket 88
May 17 10:56:34.464954 task_set_option_internal: task BGP_4652.61.19.61.1 socket 88 option RecvBuffer(0) value 16384
May 17 10:56:34.464963 task_set_option_internal: task BGP_4652.61.19.61.1 socket 88 option SendBuffer(1) value 16384
May 17 10:56:34.464966 task_set_socket: task BGP_4652.61.19.61.1 socket 88
May 17 10:56:34.464983 task_set_option_internal: task BGP_4652.61.19.61.1 socket 88 option NonBlocking(8) value 1
May 17 10:56:34.464992 task_set_option_internal: task BGP_4652.61.19.61.1 socket 88 option ReUsePort(38) value 1
May 17 10:56:34.465008 task_set_option_internal: task BGP_4652.61.19.61.1 socket 88 option PathMTUDiscovery(26) value 0
May 17 10:56:34.465018 task_set_option_internal: task BGP_4652.61.19.61.1 socket 88 option TOS(16) value 192
May 17 10:56:34.465028 task_set_option_internal: task BGP_4652.61.19.61.1 socket 88 option DontRoute(5) value 1
May 17 10:56:34.465037 task_set_option_internal: task BGP_4652.61.19.61.1 socket 88 option IifRestrict(36) value 1
May 17 10:56:34.465045 task_set_option_internal: task BGP_4652.61.19.61.1 socket 88 option TTL(15) value 1
May 17 10:56:34.465060 task_set_option_internal: task BGP_4652.61.19.61.1 socket 88 option TcpAggressiveTransmission(59) value 0
May 17 10:56:34.465157 task_timer_reset: reset BGP_4652.61.19.61.1_Connect
May 17 10:56:34.465166 task_timer_set_oneshot_latest: timer BGP_4652.61.19.61.1_Connect interval set to 1:04

 

What's wrong??

Re: BGP stuck in Connect state

$
0
0

Hi Halo,

 

Please verify IP connectivity to the peer (61.19.61.1?) and ensure the far end is configured with the correct BGP neighbor IP etc..  It seems we don't get a response from the other side.  

show system connections | grep <peer IP>

 

Hope this helps.

 

Regards,
-r.

--------------------------------------------------

If this solves your problem, please mark this post as "Accepted Solution."
Kudos are always appreciated Smiley Happy.

Re: BGP stuck in Connect state

$
0
0

Are you able to ping the peer ip and telent on port 179? share the output of following commands:

 

show route 61.19.61.1

ping 61.19.61.1

telnet 61.19.61.1 port 179

 

Re: BGP stuck in Connect state

$
0
0

Hi Halo, 

 

-Try matching BGP configuration in both sides , this will be useful, something like

 **Check if peer address/ AS number configured incorrectly on either router.

**Any other BGP configuration error.

 

-Is this Multihop using lo0? Try using TTL higher than 1

 

-Make you don’t have a firewall filter blocking port 179 on either side.

-Verify L3 connectivity – icmp

 

Please Mark My Solution Accepted if it Helped, Kudos are Appreciated too! Smiley Happy

Import ospf routen in two routing instancen

$
0
0

Hi guys,

 

I have a problem to import ospf routes in my specified init.0 tables.

 

I have two L3 vrf instances on my Juniper MX router an I must import two virtuell router from my neighboor network.

We have bgp an the neighboor network have ospf.

Thr routes from the vr-voip from my neighbour must go in the L3_VoIP.init.0 and the routes from th vr-router wifi must go in the L3_Aerohive.init.0

I became on my Juniper Interface two vlans from his virtuell routers and i must import them in the init.0 table of my vr-routers.

Today all routes going in the global init.0 table and one vr router can see the other vr-router.

 

 

Kopplung BGP OSPF.jpg

 

 


Re: Import ospf routen in two routing instancen

$
0
0

Hi Thomas,

 

You can simply configure a policy to match the routes of interest and then use "instance-import" in the respective VRF.

 

See example here: https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB19860&pmv=print

 

Hope this helps.

 

Regards,
-r.

--------------------------------------------------

If this solves your problem, please mark this post as "Accepted Solution."
Kudos are always appreciated Smiley Happy.

Re: Import ospf routen in two routing instancen

$
0
0

Hello,

The canonical way to do it is:

1/ configure 2 VLANs over ge-1/3/8, say, VLAN 100 and VLAN 200

2/ add IP addresses on each end

3/ terminate VLAN 100 L3 subinterface (say, ge-1/3/8.100) in "L3_Aerohive" VRF

4/ terminate VLAN 200 L3 subinterface (say, ge-1/3/8.200) in "L3_Voip" VRF

5/ configure OSPFv2 over ge-1/3/8.100 and ge-1/3/8.200 inside these VRFs. 

6/ Redistrubute routes of Your choice (MP-iBGP, static, direct etc) into OSPF with OSPF export policies

6a/ optionally, You'd need to disable DN bit and VPN route tag if Extreme side does not see routes from Kunde 2 MX

7/ redistribute routes received from Kunde 1 over OSPF into MP-iBGP on MX side

If You cannot create 2 VLANs on ge-1/3/8 then it becomes more difficult.

HTH

Thx
Alex 

 

Re: BGP stuck in Connect state

$
0
0

Hello,

 


 wrote:

 

What's wrong??


 

 

Most probably Your lo0.0 filter which does not allow return packets from peer.

HTH

Thx
Alex

Re: Anyone success simulate MC-LAG in logical-system?

$
0
0

Hi Kronicklez,

 

Based on the below points from the document, I don't think MC-LAG is possible with logical systems within a single chassis or VMX. You may give it a try however I expect some part of the configuration may not work.

 

Keep the following points in mind while configuring MC-LAG interfaces on logical systems:

  • You cannot use a single chassis to function as a provider edge (PE) device and a customer edge (CE) device in different logical systems.

  • You cannot use a single chassis to function as two PE devices by configuring logical systems on the chassis and ICCP. ICL links between the two logical systems because the multichassis aggregated Ethernet ID is unique in a router or switch.

  • Logical interfaces (IFLs) on the same mc-ae interface cannot be configured across multiple logical systems. In other words, in a multichassis link aggregation (MC-LAG) with both logical systems and logical interfaces (such as mc-ae ae0 unit 0), the same logical interface cannot be shared between logical systems.

 

Regards,

Rahul Gautam

 

mpls.0 & inet.3

$
0
0

Hi folks, 

Sometimes when I'm troubleshooting complex MPLS environments I have doubts with the outputs of these CLI commands:

1) show route table inet.3

        All routes learned through MPLS. 

        Only I can see PUSH actions.

2) show route table mpls.0

       I can see SWAP actions and metric always is 1.

 

Please could you clarify when use it?

Thanks in advance!

Viewing all 8688 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>