1. Can we make the 2.2.2.0 route available in inet.0 table and see if backup RE is getting polled from SNMP server in 2.2.2.0 subnet?
>>>Before breaking our monitoring, tested it on another IP range - this hasn't worked regrettably. I am able to ping the local address of 192.168.1.24 from the master and backup RE. Here is the result of the neighbour ping:
{master}
@1> show route 192.168.1.25
inet.0: 11 destinations, 11 routes (11 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
192.168.1.0/27 *[Direct/0] 9w2d 18:03:08
> via ge-1/2/2.0
INTERNET.inet.0: 617910 destinations, 2970518 routes (617621 active, 0 holddown, 3023 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
192.168.1.0/27 *[Aggregate/130] 9w6d 02:29:11
Reject
[Static/250] 9w6d 02:29:11
Discard
{master}
@1> ping 192.168.1.25
PING 192.168.1.25 (192.168.1.25): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.25: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=4.751 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.25: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=0.497 ms
{backup}
@1> show route 192.168.1.25
inet.0: 11 destinations, 11 routes (11 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
192.168.1.0/27 *[Direct/0] 9w2d 18:04:28
> via ge-1/2/2.0
INTERNET.inet.0: 633891 destinations, 3580501 routes (633844 active, 0 holddown, 617602 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
192.168.1.0/27 *[Aggregate/130] 9w2d 19:47:58
Reject
[Static/250] 9w2d 19:47:58
Discard
{backup}
@1> ping 192.168.1.25
PING 192.168.1.25 (192.168.1.25): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Network is down
ping: sendto: Network is down
2. Can we try to add a static route inside routing-instance instead of a BGP route to reach 2.2.2.0 subnet?
>>>The above is using static
3. Can you also please share the "show route" outputs from MX960 having RE-2000s(from both backup and master RE) to see if at all there is any other difference?
>>>We run full BGP table
Many thanks
CG