Disabled interface showing in BGP
Hello Experts, This might be a newbie question!I have an interface which is administratively disable. But still that interface routes shows in neighbor BGP peer. Here is the config: root@R2> show...
View ArticleRe: Policy Statement
It will not block 2.2.2.3/24 root@R2> show configuration policy-options policy-statement Testterm 1 { from { route-filter 2.2.2.2/32 exact; } then accept;}term 2 { then reject;}...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Policy Statement
Hello Rahul,But will this block everything else? Or do I have to write a from statement as well. From should be any. term 2 { then reject;}Just trying to learn basics..
View ArticleRe: Disabled interface showing in BGP
It will not advertise the route. Can you do show route 2.2.2.3 on R2? Regards,Rahul
View ArticleClik here to view.
Same are OSPF route showing up as External
Hello Experts, I have configured two routers in OSPF area 0. But when I check the peer router, it receives OSPF routes with an administrative value of 150 which I learnt as external OSPF. Can anyone...
View ArticleRe: Disabled interface showing in BGP
Its showing as a reject route.root@R2> show route 2.2.2.3inet.0: 4 destinations, 4 routes (4 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both2.2.2.3/32 *[Local/0] 00:52:28...
View ArticleRe: Disabled interface showing in BGP
Tried clearing the BGP neighborship, the route still shows up. root@R1> clear bgp neighbor Cleared 1 connections root@R1> show route 2.2.2.3 inet.0: 4 destinations, 4 routes (4 active, 0...
View ArticleRe: Disabled interface showing in BGP
This is the reason it is advertised. Loopback you've configured /24 when you disable the loopback /32 will show as reject. You can add protocol direct in your policy statement to fix this issue....
View ArticleRe: Same are OSPF route showing up as External
You're redistributing the route in OSPF using export. Expected. Regards,Rahul
View ArticleRe: Disabled interface showing in BGP
Its surprising to learn that even if the interface is down, and there is no other matching network interface the router will advertise the router just because of the reason that its specified in the...
View ArticleRe: Disabled interface showing in BGP
Hi,Your understanding is wrong. You have configured /24 address in loopback which creates two route local and direct. When you disable the loopback, /32 will be marked as reject. This is avoid punting...
View ArticleRe: Disabled interface showing in BGP
Junos OS requires that the loopback interface always be configured with a /32 network mask because the Routing Engine is essentially a host.Once you change the loopback address to /32 and disable the...
View ArticleRe: Is possible to ECMP on vrf using only source-ip address hashing
Hello,Yes, on MX-series and in JUNOS 16.1R1 & newerhttps://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/task/configuration/load-balancing-using-src-or-dst-ip-only-configuring.htmlHTHThxAlex
View ArticleRe: Disabled interface showing in BGP
We sometimes use discard and reject routes to get a route into the routing table so that we can advertise it to a BGP neighbor. In your case instead of disabling the interface you can use deactivate...
View ArticleRe: Disabled interface showing in BGP
Hi Krishna, Hope your queries has been answered. Please help to close the thread by accepting the solution so it can be referred by others. Regards,Rahul
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Disabled interface showing in BGP
Hello Rahul, Thanks for answering all my Junos noob questions patiently..
View ArticleMX Series Routing Engine and SCB datasheet
We are presently running the following RE and SCB in our environment. We are planning for future upgrade and will require information on the replacement RE and SCB types. In addition, I will need the...
View ArticleEgress and Ingress Dropflow
Hi Experts, I am new to CGNAT .Can anyone help me understand about egress and ingress dropflow and whether following output is normal or shows something wrong?? Interface Service Set...
View Article