Re: Verify hardware status of MX480
Hi, Could you get the following information: > show version > show chassis alarms > show chassis hardware models > show configuration chassis fpc 0 > show log chassisd <<<...
View ArticleRe: Verify hardware status of MX480
Here is all output root# run show versionModel: mx480Junos: 17.1R1.8JUNOS OS Kernel 32-bit [20170209.344539_builder_stable_10]JUNOS OS libs [20170209.344539_builder_stable_10]JUNOS OS runtime...
View ArticleRe: Verify hardware status of MX480
All line card appear after I added this command.set chassis network-services enhanced-ip
View ArticleRe: Verify hardware status of MX480
Thats what I would had checked & suggested "IF" you had provided me with " show configuration chassis fpc 0" output which you didn't. fpc0 becuase your orginal output indicated mpc3e in fpc0. Later...
View ArticleRe: Verify hardware status of MX480
Sorry, I missed it.But what is going on when I install mis-matched PEM.
View ArticleRe: Verify hardware status of MX480
No problems. Regarding the PEM.. Here is minor alarm: root# run show chassis alarms 2 alarms currently activeAlarm time Class Description2007-01-08 07:22:49 ICT Minor Mix of ENH-PEMs...
View ArticleRe: Verify hardware status of MX480
Do you have any idea if i connect LAN port on interface but there is no LED status shown?
View ArticleRe: Verify hardware status of MX480
Do you mean to say - you connect to one of FPC's port and you don't see green LED? Or the ether port on RE?If yes, that could be due to many of reasons such as: 1. Local Interface/port is admin down...
View Articleforwarding-table export
10.0.1.18 is an interface IP address for xe-0/0/50 192.168.0.0/28 routed to 10.0.1.1810.11.12.1 is a security device.QFX-SRX have a BGP neighborhood. 10.0.0.53/30 an interface subnet for test PC,...
View ArticleRe: forwarding-table export
For me, the setup you have described is not consistent: you write that TestPC is connected to QFX but the drawing indicates it is connected to SRX.Would be really usefuly to have a drawing where all...
View ArticleRe: resolution
Not possible via route resolution. You need to implement filter based forwarding in this scenario.
View ArticleRe: DDOS protocol violation: NDPv6:invalid-hop-limit
I'm having this problem as well. For example:Nov 7 08:01:02 routera jddosd[18562]: DDOS_PROTOCOL_VIOLATION_CLEAR: INFO: Host-bound traffic for protocol/exception NDPv6:invalid-hop-limit has returned...
View ArticleMX-5 High CPU - RPD - Resolve tree 2
Hi All, I have been tshooting high CPU on my MX5-t ... the 'User' process is hogging the CPU... l.net> show chassis routing-engine | match User User...
View ArticleRe: resolution
As an alternative, you could install a route to 10.1.1.1/32 with the next-table option for the routing instance you want to use in the inet.0 table.
View ArticleRe: forwarding-table export
What is the routing table on the SRX for 192.168.0.0/28 From your trace route it appears that the QFX has the 192.168.0.1/32 route pointing to the SRX while the SRX wants to send that same prefix back...
View ArticleHow to make RSVP-dynamic working with LDP
Hi I got a problem about RSVP-dynamic with LDP and reserch nothing useful.As follow URL, I wish to use case3 Dynamic RSVP Only. And let rsvp as backup lsp with LDPBut after configured, I still don't...
View ArticleRe: resolution
Thanks Steve - I am aware of the 'next-table' functionality ... but what I want to achieve is a mechanism whereby a route (for example the 10.1.1.1/32 route) exists in the inet.0 table under normal...
View ArticleRe: resolution
That is what I am suggesting. Since you don't want all routes but only specific ones create the backup routes using next table so that they kick in when the primary one is lost.
View ArticleFiltering static routes on a next-table
It seems to be possible to filter static routes matching a particular next-hop but is it possible to filter on a next-table?
View ArticleRe: Filtering static routes on a next-table
Unfortunately matching next table is not an option the full list of options is here....
View Article