Re: MC-LAG with LDP L2
if PW R1<-> R3 gone for some reason how MC-LAG know to change state of CE-left to R2 as active PW
View ArticleRe: Memory issue on MX480
Hi Ashvin,I swapp today the route engine and the memory is always the same: show chassis routing-engine Routing Engine status: Slot 0: Current state Backup Election priority Master Temperature 38...
View ArticleRe: MC-LAG with LDP L2
Hi, One of the challenge of this is asymmetric PWs and MC-LAG. e.g PW active on R1 and mc-ae on R2.This would probably blackhole traffic. Does it have to be a point to point l2circuit? Cheers,Ashvin
View ArticleRe: MC-LAG with LDP L2
If we are looking for a best solution , then it is EVPN as it supports active/active . But then i understand the requirement is to use LDP , EVPN supports BGP signaling only.
View ArticleRe: MC-LAG with LDP L2
Hi, If P2MP is possible then VPLS is an option.Other points to consider is mode of MC-LAG [active-active v/s active-standby], VPLS design [multihoming or remote sites for R1 & R2].Another option...
View ArticleRe: Memory issue on MX480
Hi, From the last snapshot, master RE is RE1 which is at 50% mem usage.Backup RE is RE0 running at 75% mem. Is that still the same? Cheers,Ashvin
View ArticleRe: Memory issue on MX480
Hi Ashin,exactly, but now I already rebbot the RE0 in back and the situation is: marco@FIMX480-re1> show chassis routing-engine Routing Engine status: Slot 0: Current state Backup Election priority...
View ArticleOSPF config with (2) EX4600s
I'm looking to replace a few Cisco devices with a pair of EX4600s. These are NOT setup as a virtual chassis, just a primary/secondary config. The 4600s are using VRRP to house the IRB's for a handful...
View ArticleRe: OSPF config with (2) EX4600s
You can try to set different cost for link on primary and secondary , so all traffic will be forwarded thogh primary
View ArticleRe: Memory issue on MX480
Hi,Is GRES and NSR enabled as the backup RE using at 43% memory.Cheers,Ashvin
View ArticleRe: Memory issue on MX480
Hi Ashvin,we finally complete the swap and the memory is under 50% show chassis routing-engine Routing Engine status: Slot 0: Current state Master Election priority Master Temperature 38 degrees C /...
View ArticleQuestion on IRB Functionality
HI Folks, We have 2 MX 240 running MCLAG Active/Active over IRB with multi-homed ISP's. We advertise each ISP subnet via BGP to the respective ISP's. For this, we have created one IRB interface per ISP...
View ArticleSetting local preference on rd-prefix on ASBR
On RR2 is it possible to write a policy to set a higher local preference on RD-PREFIX 200:11111:150.1.1.0/24 coming from ASN 2 so that traffic will be symmetric?
View ArticleRe: Setting local preference on rd-prefix on ASBR
Hi, This might be possible using an import policy on the MP-BGP neighbor. Example:policy-statement import-200-11111 { term pref { from { protocol bgp; family inet-vpn; community 200:11111; as-path AS2;...
View ArticleRe: Setting local preference on rd-prefix on ASBR
Thanks Ashvin! I will try that solution. I was looking for something like "from rd-prefix 200:11111:150.1.1.1.0/24 exact" but I saw that "rd-prefix wasn't an option. Jeff Lavender
View ArticleRe: Can MX480 running 11.4R11.4 perform an ISSU upgrade to 13.3R9.13?
I've upgraded directly from 11.4 to 13.3 on various MX boxes so the version jump is fine. But not using HA clustering so there might be some nuances there. You can use the dry run option to run ISSU...
View ArticleMX240 performance
Hi,I had read this: "The MX series supports 16M/1M IPv4 routes RIB/FIB, 750k/750k IPv6 RIB/FIB, 4000/500/500 BGP/OSPF/IS-IS sessions and 2000 BGP peers" But this is true with RE-S-2000 (single or...
View ArticleRe: MX240 performance
I assume you pulled the MX240 specs from the current spec sheet. If so, I would assume that the older EOL RE-S-2000 routing engine that shows only support for 32bit Junos and lower RAM will not be...
View ArticleRouted Vlan Interface (RVI) not working on Juniper EX3300 Switch
Inter-vlan routing with Juniper switches is driving me crazy. For some reason, the RVI gateway of 192.168.10.1 and 10.0.0.1 is not able to reach any devices on the 192.168.1.0 subnet. All of the other...
View Article