Re: dedicated links for specific prefix in ospf
Hello, You could configure static routes in s1, s2, s3 and s4 for 3.3.3.0/24 and 4.4.4.0/24 with the dedicated links as next-hops. You should not configure ospf in those links, and the static routes...
View ArticleRe: Enabling L3VPN multipath - BGP or routing-instance
Hello, Great question. The BGP level one is logically for BGP, the routing-instance level one is supposed to be protocol-independent. As you may see both commands have different further options: BGP...
View ArticleRDP works only if ping was running first.
Scenario.Cluster of SRXs have interface reth0.222 with ip 192.168.222.1/27.In the same network we have SSL VPN MAG6611 with internal ip 192.168.222.30/27 and multiple servers on 192.168.222.4,5,6.../27...
View ArticleRe: RDP works only if ping was running first.
The issue appears to be some asymmetrical routing to the pool addresses you have setup on the SSL VPN. Adding the route to the server prevents the asymmetry with the firewall hop. Options would be...
View ArticleRe: redistribute same net into ospf in different devices
Hello, I am assuming the blue router and the two green ones are all different. If only one of the links (r1-s1 and r1-s2) is active at any given time then it would be easier to configure the blue...
View ArticleClik here to view.
make area 3 not advertise type 5 from other area
As shown in pic above, there is ASBR in area 1 (1.1.1.0/24)and 2(2.2.2.0/24), in case s1-s2 link down, it will use s1-s3-s2 to talk to each other. My requirement is to make s1-s3 ,s2-s3 only for...
View ArticleRe: dedicated links for specific prefix in ospf
If I understand this correctly you need two links instead of one for the router connections. If so, you simplest solution is to create an AE interface. Add AE to the configurationMove the ip address...
View ArticleRe: make area 3 not advertise type 5 from other area
I am not sure I have the picture right. but I think your S3 is only in area 3. If so, if you change this to a stub area and push a default then it would not get the detail routes from the other...
View ArticleRe: make area 3 not advertise type 5 from other area
hello ,Steve thanks for your reply1: s1-s3 link are area 0, s2-s3 link are area 0, but I can change it to area 3 2: I can't set area 3 as stub area and get default 0 since s3 already has a static...
View ArticleRe: make area 3 not advertise type 5 from other area
I am not sure I have the picture right. but I think your S3 is only in area 3. If so, if you change this to a stub area and push a default then it would not get the detail routes from the other...
View ArticleRe: make area 3 not advertise type 5 from other area
Hello,Robbie wrote: 2: I can't set area 3 as stub area and get default 0 since s3 already has a static default 0/0 to another place(not mentioned in the pic) You don't need to set S3 in stub area 3,...
View ArticleMulticast Testing
Hello again,Thanks in advance for your help with this basic lab issue.I am having a lot of trouble doing simple testing for Multicast in a Juniper lab. My lab works fine with Cisco CE's, but the...
View ArticleRe: dedicated links for specific prefix in ospf
hello SteveWe don't want to use AE any other suggestion for it?
View ArticleRe: Multicast Testing
Hi, You can probably try using protocol sap instead of igmp for doing ping test. Here are the details:...
View ArticleRe: dedicated links for specific prefix in ospf
As mentioned above, OSPF will not allow the behavior you want. So you will need to change routing protocols for the links. Besides the static routes mentioned above you could switch to BGP. You would...
View ArticleRe: Multicast Testing
Hi SaraThirao,Thanks again for helping with these Juniper configs. It seems to be true that Juniper makes everything difficult. Why is it such a pain to test multicast. Cisco makes it easy. Very...
View ArticleConfiguring Multihoming on the PE Router for VPLS !
Hello,I try to test with configuring Multihoming on the PE Router for VPLS. PE1:routing-instances { VPLS-TESTING { instance-type vpls; vlan-id 782; interface xe-0/0/1.782; vrf-target target:111:111;...
View Article